Ruihong Wang

Department ofOcular Trauma, The Third Hospital of Handan (HandanCity Eye Hospital), Handan, 056001,China

Abstract:Objective Explore the the clinicaloutcomes of RS lacrimal tube versus epidural anesthesia tube for lacrimalcanalicular laceration. Methods it was devided into two groups That 65participants with lacrimal canalicular laceration. The treatment Group Wereinserted with RS tubes which were placed in superior and inferior canaliculi.The control Group Were inserted with epidural lanesthesia inbutation. ResultsIt was significant difference that the effective rate between the treatment groupand the control group, which was 89.5% and 70.1% (P<0.05). and the comparison that the complication rate of thesegroups resulted with statistically significant difference (P<0.05).Consequence By using this modified lacramal intubation technique, RS can beutilized efficiently, easily, and nontraumatically in basic hospitals for thetreatment of the lacrimal canalicular laceration.

Keywords: Lacrimal canalicular laceration; RSlacrimal tube;  Epidural lanesthesia; Inbutation; Lacramal intubation